<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five super style guides for writers, editors and proofreaders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theworkshop.co.uk/five-super-style-guides-for-writers-editors-and-proofreaders/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theworkshop.co.uk/five-super-style-guides-for-writers-editors-and-proofreaders?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=five-super-style-guides-for-writers-editors-and-proofreaders</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:23:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Workshop</title>
		<link>http://www.theworkshop.co.uk/five-super-style-guides-for-writers-editors-and-proofreaders#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>The Workshop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10.0.0.90/wsblog/?p=60#comment-4</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;@Jo&lt;/em&gt; You&#039;re absolutely right about having a client-specific guide to cover any in-house quirks or standards. This is something we do on every project, wherever possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>@Jo</em> You&#8217;re absolutely right about having a client-specific guide to cover any in-house quirks or standards. This is something we do on every project, wherever possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.theworkshop.co.uk/five-super-style-guides-for-writers-editors-and-proofreaders#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10.0.0.90/wsblog/?p=60#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Good list - I can&#039;t work without my library of guides. Butcher of course, and the Times guide gets used almost daily but always cross-ref&#039;d to the Oxford. Company websites are useful as are DirGov, BBC and HMRC sites. But I also produce a client-specific guide for each client to cover all the in-house stuff like capitals for job titles and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good list &#8211; I can&#8217;t work without my library of guides. Butcher of course, and the Times guide gets used almost daily but always cross-ref&#8217;d to the Oxford. Company websites are useful as are DirGov, BBC and HMRC sites. But I also produce a client-specific guide for each client to cover all the in-house stuff like capitals for job titles and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain Broome</title>
		<link>http://www.theworkshop.co.uk/five-super-style-guides-for-writers-editors-and-proofreaders#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Broome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10.0.0.90/wsblog/?p=60#comment-2</guid>
		<description>All good suggestions. I also use the Oxford Manual of Style, as do many others, of course. I actually think the style guide is a much underused resource these days. With the blogging culture comes a tendency to publish without, well, without any consideration for consistency at all. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good suggestions. I also use the Oxford Manual of Style, as do many others, of course. I actually think the style guide is a much underused resource these days. With the blogging culture comes a tendency to publish without, well, without any consideration for consistency at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

